Chopard L.U.C Lunar One Platinum Watch Review | aBlogtoWatch

Chopard L.U.C Lunar One Platinum Watch Review

See more @ www.aBlogtoWatch.com
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/ablogtowatch

Ariel Adams of aBlogtoWatch reviews the Chopard L.U.C Lunar One limited edition in blue and platinum.

FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com/aBlogtoWatch
INSTAGRAM: @ablogtowatch
TWITTER: @aBlogtoWatch

Comments

Purplehaze5995 says:

Very beautiful. Sexy watch.

Robert Sanchez says:

I can think of a lot of shit I can buy with 69k ! It does not look like a $69000. Dollar watch to me but whatever

حماس بلا حدود says:

أهلا أخي

Drawing watches says:

Got an advert for oris

حماس بلا حدود says:

أنا اشتركت في قناتك ممكن تشترك في قناتي و عمل لايك

Abhishek Srivastava says:

Beautiful watch…. but doesn’t blow my mind.

Stu says:

Plastic to protect it in transit not as you wear it! Plastic off, like an old lady who leaves plastic on sofas. There is always something in your reviews you are unsure about, the size, the power reserve, so unprofessional, annoying. You own the site, you have guys who do this all 100 times better than you, the guy that did the Baselworld was a star, you are useless. Blah blah blah.

Felipe Jr. Berenguel says:

Automatic watches aren’t reliable time giver.

Jari Norvanto says:

Stopped listening after circa 4 min. Many wrongs:
Platinum 95% is hardly (!) less scratch resistant than 75% gold alloy. At least not any practically used jewel gold alloy. Pure platinum is much harder than pure gold on the Mohs scale. I doubt you’d feel any obvious mass difference, weighing it in your hand. Platinum is not difficult to machine. Why should it be? Unless your bundled in certain myths about metals that this vid perpetuates. And shouldn’t you know the power reserve, if you review the timepiece?

Xiang Fan says:

Movement is too small, compare to the size of the case,

Adrian B says:

950 platinum MORE scratch resistant than 18ct (750) gold IMO

Watch Addict Watch Reviews says:

new set?

Christopher Wood -MDH- says:

Way overpriced

Nick G says:

Good looking watch if it was only 65,000 cheaper

Andrew Steel says:

Nice piece…thing that really caught me was the inside of the strap.

quwers says:

$69k since you were wondering.

 Write a comment

*

Do you like our videos?
Do you want to see more like that?

Please click below to support us on Facebook!